In association with
Logo Logo Logo

IS CHANGE OF LEADERSHIP IN USA NECESSARY, EVEN IF IT WOULD NOT BE BETTER ?

Two recent unhappy events namely COVID 19 crisis  and the murder of George Floyd by white policeman are bound to  become electoral issue  in the coming election, with the opposition parties, section of media and sworn critics holding Trump responsible for these two unhappy problems confronting USA.

With the  US Presidential election only a few months away, a substantial section of US citizens must have made up their mind now about  casting their vote  in favour of Biden or Trump.

Normally, before the US Presidential election, there would be considerable wrangle about the choice of Presidential candidate by both the principal  parties. However, this time, the Democratic party  chose Biden as it’s candidate without much of debate and Republican party too  decided in favour of Trump as it’s candidate without much of debate. The usual excitement that would be associated with the nomination of a Presidential candidate has been missing this time, causing disappointment for the curious observers.

Even before the last Presidential election, the section of print and visual media in the USA carried out vituperative criticism against Donald Trump and the severity of  such criticism has not tapered down during the Presidency of Trump.  Therefore, people in USA are aware about the views and prejudices of the section of media against  Trump   and therefore, continued criticism of such media against Trump may not have a significant impact on the   results of the forthcoming US Presidential election.

Two recent unhappy events namely COVID 19 crisis  and the murder of George Floyd by white policeman are bound to  become electoral issue  in the coming election, with the opposition parties, section of media and sworn critics holding Trump responsible for these two unhappy problems confronting USA.

However, the discerning observers amongst citizens who do not hold any particular view for or against Trump would introspect deeper before casting their votes.  The votes of these unprejudiced citizens are likely to be the deciding factor in the choice of next US President.

Many impartial observers refuse to blame President Trump for COVID 19 crisis in the USA and any criticism that Trump did not take preventive steps to avoid COVID 19 crisis cannot stand  independent scrutiny.  No country in the world anticipated such magnitude of the COVID 19 problem and the fact that China concealed the information to the world  when it occurred in Wuhan and W H O colluded with China in concealing the information is believed by many people to be correct.

President Trump left it to the Governors to handle the COVID 19 crisis and this is what it should be.  It is true that Trump  underestimated the seriousness of COVID 19 crisis earlier, which is a matter of judgement and the benefit of doubt should be given to him. Several governments in Europe and other countries reacted in the same way as  the U S did.

In the case of the murder of George Floyd, it would be extremely unfair to blame President Trump for this and he lost no time in condemning it.  When the violent prone protestors took law into their own hands and destroyed public properties, President Trump had no alternative other than threatening to put down such violence by force.  No government can afford to remain as  a spectator when the protestors indulge in violence , whatever may be the cause.

The critics and opposition  party exploiting  the above two unhappy events to discredit President Trump and spoil his public image may not cut ice amongst many  discerning people.

It is true that President Trump has often made himself  a subject of ridicule for the cartoonist by making avoidable observations  and speaking too much . This  is a weakness for the man and this cannot be an issue for electing the next President.

The basic approach of President Trump in defending the American business interests and stating clearly “America first” are certainly recognized and applauded by many people. His decision to confront China is a matter of absolute need and he has taken the bull by the horn in dealing with China,   with no other US President  having  done  so before.

The fact that American economy has done reasonably well during Trump’s tenure and the steps he has taken to revive the economy  after the COVID 19 crisis will not go unnoticed even by the worst critics.

Many would wonder whether the Democratic  party  candidate  would  go soft on China , if he were to be the next President.  No American would want this.

Former President Obama  campaigning for Biden may not help the electoral prospects of Biden significantly.  Many people would still remember that President Obama suddenly visited a mosque   and asked the African Americans to defend their rights before the last Presidential election , which inevitably gave an impression that Obama was trying to please a section of people by appeasing them  for the sake of votes . Considering the fact that Obama himself is not a white person, many may ask as to what he did to enhance the status  of blacks in America during his Presidentship.

Obama was not tough against China and this became very clear , when he received the  respected  Tibetan leader the Dalai Lama through the backdoors of White House , so that Chinese government would not be annoyed by his entertaining the Dalai Lama.  By this process, many think that Obama insulted the Dalai Lama.

As of now, the US Presidential election is still open and campaign would become more bitter as the days go on.  But, the discerning observers amongst US citizens would not be guided by rhetorics and media  views .

Comment here !
Related News

DANI RODRIK, CAMBRIDGE – Neoliberalism is dead. Or perhaps it remains very much alive. Pundits have been calling it both

FABIO PANETTA, FRANKFURT – The COVID-19 pandemic has caused the largest decrease in global economic activity on record. But the

Last month, the Journal of Controversial Ideas – of which I am a co-editor – published its first issue. The

PETER SINGER, MELBOURNE – Last month, the Journal of Controversial Ideas – of which I am a co-editor – published