It is inevitable that a coin has two sides. Similarly, every view can have an alternate view on any matter. It is very rare that all people think in the same way and agree on every point. Therefore, the difference in views between individuals on any matter is nothing to be concerned about.
However, there are some professions, where the professional has to be strictly neutral and listen to all kinds of views carefully and dispassionately, look from different angles at the happenings around and then state the views on matters, that would be fair to the views and priorities from all sides, without giving an impression about taking sides in any matter.
The professions like teaching and journalism call for such attributes amongst those who join these professions.
This requirement obviously implies that a teacher or a journalist can not be an activist or agitator or be a participant in any political or sectarian group, which, if done, inevitably would be contrary to the ethos of the profession of teaching and journalism These days, sometimes, we see teachers and journalists pledging their loyalty to a particular political party or pressure group and involve themselves in activism in the name of
fighting for what they consider as a just cause. In other words, such professionals develop a closed mindset, with a refusal to see the other point of view. In the process, they create an image of themselves as having an “anti view” rather than an impartial view. This is happening too frequently these days and can be ignored only at the risk of losing the glorious reputation of the noble profession of teaching and journalism.
Truly, teachers are the builders of the quality mindset amongst the students in the formative age group and therefore, teachers have to be role models for the students. They have to teach the students to think objectively and train them in taking a holistic view of any matter and refrain from developing a prejudiced mindset. Students would get such a mindset, only if the teachers would conduct themselves with the lofty standards of being neutral, unprejudiced with the capability of conducting the dispassionate analysis. They should not only be so but also appear to be so.
In the same way, journalists have the duty to promote healthy and objective discussions amongst the people and guide them in developing an attitude of equanimity, tolerance, and fairness in dealings. While the journalists are entitled to be critical on occasions, they should take extraordinary care to remain balanced in views, while making observations. Hate feelings and hateful utterances are un journalistic behavior.
Unlike the teachers who largely operate in closed setup, the journalists operate in vast areas and extended territory, and therefore, any prejudiced voice of the journalists will have far-reaching adverse implications on the overall societal behavior. The journalists may become a negative force if they would not live up to the ethos of the profession, which is neutrality in outlook and approach.
Journalists would be able to play this lofty role expected of them, only if they would lead a lifestyle of
simplicity and not aspiring for positions and power at any cost. Obviously, this implies they may have to sacrifice certain pleasures for the sake of the cause of journalism.
Many senior citizens think today that section of journalists are no more the fair and neutral journalists that they knew of.
Traditionally, journalists are viewed as the pillar of a democratic society and they should be true to this role by having appropriate culture and value systems, that a progressive and forward-looking society desperately needs. The journalists have the duty and responsibility to ensure that they are recognized as a dependable and trustworthy section of society that everyone can depend upon.
Traditionally, teachers and journalists are highly respected and are looked upon by the people as the embodiment of wisdom and fairness. Such an image should be further cultivated and strengthened.
In such circumstances, teachers and journalists functioning like activists and agitators is anachronism. One can not be an activist and at the same time remain as a journalist or a teacher.
The increasing tendency of teachers and journalists to take the role of activists needs to be strongly disapproved and discouraged.
Who can do this better than the journalists and teachers themselves, who value the ethos of the profession and have the willingness and desire and courage to live up to the ethical and moral standards that the profession of teaching and journalism should have?
Comment here !
Multilateralism has been on the defensive in recent years. In a global setting that is more multipolar than multilateral, competition
The summer of 2021 has come to be largely defined by the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and accelerating climate change. Both
The European Union is one of the few signatories to the 2015 Paris climate agreement that initially committed to binding
The International Economic Association’s triennial World Congress has long been one of the most important global gatherings of economists, owing